<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>

<rdf:RDF
 xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
 xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
 xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/"
 xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
 xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
 xmlns:prism="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/prism/"
 xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
>

<channel rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org">
<title>Annals of Oncology - current issue</title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org</link>
<description>Annals of Oncology - RSS feed of current issue</description>
<prism:eIssn>1569-8041</prism:eIssn>
<prism:coverDisplayDate>July 2008</prism:coverDisplayDate>
<prism:publicationName>Annals of Oncology</prism:publicationName>
<prism:issn>0923-7534</prism:issn>
<items>
 <rdf:Seq>
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/7/1211?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/7/1213?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/7/1216?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/7/1219?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/7/1224?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/7/1231?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/7/1242?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/7/1249?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/7/1255?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/7/1261?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/7/1266?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/7/1271?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/7/1278?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/7/1284?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/7/1288?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/7/1293?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/7/1299?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/7/1304?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/7/1308?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/7/1312?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/7/1320?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/7/1327?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/7/1331?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/7/1336?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/7/1340?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/7/1347?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/7/1355?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/7/1356?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/7/1357?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/7/1359?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/7/1360?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/7/1360-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/7/1361?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/7/1363?rss=1" />
 </rdf:Seq>
</items>
</channel>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/7/1211?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[In this issue]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/7/1211?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-06-25</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdn415</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[In this issue]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>7</prism:number>
<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1211</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1211</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>in this issue</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/7/1213?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The difficult decision-making process for using or not using adjuvant chemotherapy in premenopausal endocrine-responsive breast cancer patients]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/7/1213?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Del Mastro, L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-06-25</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdn157</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The difficult decision-making process for using or not using adjuvant chemotherapy in premenopausal endocrine-responsive breast cancer patients]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>7</prism:number>
<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1215</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1213</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>editorials</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/7/1216?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Cancer survivorship: a challenge for the European oncologists]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/7/1216?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Simonelli, C., Annunziata, M. A., Chimienti, E., Berretta, M., Tirelli, U.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-06-25</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdn384</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Cancer survivorship: a challenge for the European oncologists]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>7</prism:number>
<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1217</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1216</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>editorials</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/7/1219?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Src as a potential therapeutic target in non-small-cell lung cancer]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/7/1219?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Lung cancer is the most common cause of cancer-related death, with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) accounting for 80%&ndash;85% of all cases. Although survival rates are reasonably good for patients diagnosed with very early disease, the majority of patients present with advanced disease. For these patients, palliation and improvements in quality of life are the primary goals of therapy. Although chemotherapeutic agents remain the cornerstone of first-line therapy, these agents have limited use in patients who have relapsed and have metastatic disease. Therefore, new strategies are required to improve survival and quality of life in this setting. With the substantial advances in our understanding of tumour biology, it has been possible to identify signalling pathways involved in mediating tumour growth and progression. These pathways offer targets for new biological agents such as small molecule inhibitors and monoclonal antibodies. One such target is Src, a tyrosine kinase that is involved in multiple aspects of tumorigenesis including proliferation, migration and angiogenesis. Increased levels of Src expression have been found in a range of cancers, especially breast, colorectal, prostate and lung. Preliminary preclinical data and pharmacodynamic data suggest that Src inhibition is a viable therapeutic option in the treatment of advanced NSCLC.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Giaccone, G., Zucali, P. A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-06-25</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdn048</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Src as a potential therapeutic target in non-small-cell lung cancer]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>7</prism:number>
<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1223</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1219</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>reviews</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/7/1224?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Pancreatic cancer--is the wall crumbling?]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/7/1224?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>In spite of advances made in the management of the other more common cancers of the gastrointestinal tract, significant progress in the treatment of pancreatic cancer remains elusive, more so with the recent negative results of several much anticipated randomized trials. Gemcitabine has been a standard treatment for advanced pancreatic cancer since it was shown a decade ago to result in a superior clinical benefit response and survival compared with bolus 5-fluorouracil (5-FU). Since then, clinical trials have explored the pharmacokinetic modulation of gemcitabine by fixed dose administration and the combination of gemcitabine with other cytotoxics or the biological &lsquo;targeted&rsquo; agents. Against a background of numerous negative randomized trials of gemcitabine-based combination treatment, two trials have recently reported modest survival improvements with the use of combination treatment: the United Kingdom National Cancer Research GEMCAP trial of gemcitabine with the orally administered precursor of 5-FU&ndash;capecitabine and the National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group PA.3 trial in which the tyrosine kinase inhibitor erlotinib was used with gemcitabine. This review will summarize the results of several recent randomized trials of combination treatment in advanced pancreatic cancer and discuss their implications for clinical practice and for future research in this disease.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chua, Y. J., Zalcberg, J. R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-06-25</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdn063</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Pancreatic cancer--is the wall crumbling?]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>7</prism:number>
<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1230</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1224</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>reviews</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/7/1231?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Premenopausal endocrine-responsive early breast cancer: who receives chemotherapy?]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/7/1231?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background:</b> The role of chemotherapy in addition to combined endocrine therapy for premenopausal women with endocrine-responsive early breast cancer remains an open question, yet trials designed to answer it have repeatedly failed to adequately accrue. The International Breast Cancer Study Group initiated two concurrent trials in this population: in Premenopausal Endocrine Responsive Chemotherapy (PERCHE), chemotherapy use is determined by randomization and in Tamoxifen and Exemestane Trial (TEXT) by physician choice. PERCHE closed with inadequate accrual; TEXT accrued rapidly.</p>
<p><b>Methods:</b> From 2003 to 2006, 1317 patients (890 with baseline data) were randomly assigned to receive ovarian function suppression (OFS) plus tamoxifen or OFS plus exemestane for 5 years in TEXT. We explore patient-related factors according to whether or not chemotherapy was given using descriptive statistics and classification and regression trees.</p>
<p><b>Results:</b> Adjuvant chemotherapy was chosen for 64% of patients. Lymph node status was the predominant determinant of chemotherapy use (88% of node positive treated versus 46% of node negative). Geography, patient age, tumor size and grade were also determinants, but degree of receptor positivity and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 status were not.</p>
<p><b>Conclusions:</b> The perceived estimation of increased risk of relapse is the primary determinant for using chemotherapy despite uncertainties regarding the degree of benefit it offers when added to combined endocrine therapy in this population.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Regan, M. M., Pagani, O., Walley, B., Torrisi, R., Perez, E. A., Francis, P., Fleming, G. F., Price, K. N., Thurlimann, B., Maibach, R., Castiglione-Gertsch, M., Coates, A. S., Goldhirsch, A., Gelber, R. D., for the SOFT/TEXT/PERCHE Steering Committee and the International Breast Cancer Study Group]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-06-25</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdn037</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Premenopausal endocrine-responsive early breast cancer: who receives chemotherapy?]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>7</prism:number>
<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1241</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1231</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>breast cancer</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/7/1242?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Defining prognosis for women with breast cancer and CNS metastases by HER2 status]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/7/1242?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background:</b> The purpose of this retrospective study was to determine, in a cohort of patients with breast cancer and central nervous system (CNS) metastases, the effect of trastuzumab in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive disease and to compare this with that of patients with HER2-negative disease.</p>
<p><b>Methods:</b> Five hundred and ninety-eight patients with invasive breast cancer, CNS metastases and known HER2 status were identified. Time to CNS metastases and survival after CNS metastases were estimated by the Kaplan&ndash;Meier method, and Cox models were fitted to determine the association between HER2 status, trastuzumab treatment and outcomes after adjustment for other patient characteristics.</p>
<p><b>Results:</b> In the multivariable model, patients with HER2-negative disease [Hazard ratio (HR) 1.50, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.15&ndash;1.95, <I>P</I> = 0.003] and patients with HER2-positive disease who did not receive trastuzumab (HR 2.13, 95% CI 1.51&ndash;3.00, <I>P</I> &lt; 0.0001) had shorter times to CNS metastases compared with patients with HER2-positive disease who had received trastuzumab as first-line therapy for metastases. Furthermore, patients with HER2-negative disease (HR 1.66, 95% CI 1.31&ndash;2.12, <I>P</I> &lt; 0.0001) and patients with HER2-positive disease who had never received trastuzumab (HR 1.34, 95% CI 0.78&ndash;2.30, <I>P</I> = 0.28) had an increased hazard of death compared with patients with HER2-positive disease who had received trastuzumab before or at the time of CNS metastases diagnosis.</p>
<p><b>Conclusion:</b> In our cohort of patients with breast cancer and CNS metastases, patients with HER2-positive disease treated with trastuzumab had longer times to development of and better survival from CNS metastases compared with patients with HER2-positive disease who had never received trastuzumab and patients with HER2-negative breast cancer.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dawood, S., Broglio, K., Esteva, F. J., Ibrahim, N. K., Kau, S.-W., Islam, R., Aldape, K. D., Yu, T.-K., Hortobagyi, G. N., Gonzalez-Angulo, A. M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-06-25</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdn036</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Defining prognosis for women with breast cancer and CNS metastases by HER2 status]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>7</prism:number>
<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1248</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1242</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>breast cancer</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/7/1249?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Comparison between positron emission tomography using 2-[fluorine-18]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose, conventional imaging and computed tomography for staging of breast cancer]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/7/1249?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background:</b> The presence, extent and localization of distant metastases are key prognostic factors in breast cancer patients and play a central role in therapeutic decision making. The aim of this study was to compare the diagnostic performance of positron emission tomography using 2-[fluorine-18]fluoro-2-deoxy-<scp>D</scp>-glucose (FDG&ndash;PET) with that of computed tomography (CT) and conventional imaging including chest radiography, abdominal ultrasound and bone scintigraphy.</p>
<p><b>Patients and methods:</b> A total of 119 consecutive patients with newly diagnosed locally advanced disease (<I>n</I> = 69) or previous history of breast cancer (<I>n</I> = 50) who had clinical suspicion of metastatic disease underwent FDG&ndash;PET, CT and conventional imaging procedures. Imaging results were retrospectively compared with histopathology and clinical follow-up which served as a reference standard.</p>
<p><b>Results:</b> FDG&ndash;PET detected distant metastases with a sensitivity of 87% and a specificity of 83%. In contrast, the sensitivity and specificity of combined conventional imaging procedures were 43% and 98%, respectively. CT revealed a sensitivity of 83% and a specificity of 85%.</p>
<p><b>Conclusions:</b> In breast cancer, FDG&ndash;PET is superior to conventional imaging procedures for detection of distant metastases. Although FDG&ndash;PET and CT provided similar diagnostic accuracy, the information was often found to be complementary. With increasing availability of FDG&ndash;PET/CT, prospective studies are needed to determine whether it could potentially replace the array of conventional imaging procedures used today.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mahner, S., Schirrmacher, S., Brenner, W., Jenicke, L., Habermann, C. R., Avril, N., Dose-Schwarz, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-06-25</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdn057</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Comparison between positron emission tomography using 2-[fluorine-18]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose, conventional imaging and computed tomography for staging of breast cancer]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>7</prism:number>
<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1254</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1249</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>breast cancer</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/7/1255?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Phase II multicenter study of larotaxel (XRP9881), a novel taxoid, in patients with metastatic breast cancer who previously received taxane-based therapy]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/7/1255?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background:</b> Treatment options are limited for patients with refractory metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Larotaxel (XRP9881) is a novel taxoid with preclinical activity against taxane-resistant breast cancer. The current phase II trial of larotaxel was conducted in women with taxane-treated MBC.</p>
<p><b>Patients and methods:</b> Patients were stratified by response to prior taxane therapy (resistant or nonresistant). Larotaxel 90 mg/m<sup>2</sup> was administered as a 1-h infusion every 3 weeks. Patients were evaluated for tumor response every two cycles. A blinded external response review committee determined the overall response rate (ORR), duration of response (DOR), and time to progression (TtP) of the disease. Median survival time (MST) and safety were also evaluated.</p>
<p><b>Results:</b> One hundred and thirty patients were treated. In the nonresistant group, the ORR was 42%; median DOR 5.3 months; median TtP 5.4 months; and MST 22.6 months. In the resistant group, the ORR was 19%; median DOR 5.0 months; median TtP 1.6 months; and MST 9.8 months. The most common grade 3/4 adverse events were neutropenia (82%), fatigue (15%), diarrhea (12%), febrile neutropenia (9%), neutropenic infection (8%), and sensory neuropathy (7%).</p>
<p><b>Conclusions:</b> Larotaxel has good activity, manageable toxicity, and a favorable therapeutic index in women with taxane-pretreated MBC.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dieras, V., Limentani, S., Romieu, G., Tubiana-Hulin, M., Lortholary, A., Kaufman, P., Girre, V., Besenval, M., Valero, V.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-06-25</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdn060</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Phase II multicenter study of larotaxel (XRP9881), a novel taxoid, in patients with metastatic breast cancer who previously received taxane-based therapy]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>7</prism:number>
<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1260</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1255</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>breast cancer</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/7/1261?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[p53 status and efficacy of primary anthracyclines/alkylating agent-based regimen according to breast cancer molecular classes]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/7/1261?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background:</b> We hypothesized that, among molecular subclasses of breast cancer, p53 status may have a differential predictive value for the efficacy of anthracyclines/alkylating agents-based regimen. We analysed the efficacy of a preoperative combination between 5-fluorouracil, anthracyclines and cyclophosphamide according to both p53 status and molecular classification.</p>
<p><b>Patients and methods:</b> Oestrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PgR), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) expression and p53 status were determined by immunohistochemistry in 293 samples from two different centres. A logistic regression model was used for multivariate analysis of predictors for pathological complete response (pCR).</p>
<p><b>Results:</b> p53 immunostaining (54%) was associated with high grade (<I>P</I> = 0.002) and ER negativity (<I>P</I> = 0.04). p53 was detected in 59% of triple-negative tumours (ER&ndash;/PgR&ndash;/HER2&ndash;, <I>n</I> = 120 patients). In the overall population, pCR (9.6%) was independently predicted by high tumour grade (<I>P</I> = 0.002) and ER/PgR/HER2 triple negativity (<I>P</I> = 0.0004), but not by p53 status (<I>P</I> = 0.12). p53 immunostaining was associated with a trend for a higher rate of pCR in triple-negative tumours [relative risk (RR) = 2.5, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.8&ndash;7.5, <I>P</I> = 0.09], but not in non-triple-negative tumours (RR = 0.73, 95% CI = 0.16&ndash;3.3, <I>P</I> = 0.69).</p>
<p><b>Conclusion:</b> p53 status may have a different predictive value for efficacy of anthracycline/alkylating agents-based regimen in each molecular subclass, a result which may explain the different results reported in literature.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bidard, F.-C., Matthieu, M.-C., Chollet, P., Raoefils, I., Abrial, C., Domont, J., Spielmann, M., Delaloge, S., Andre, F., Penault-Llorca, F.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-06-25</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdn039</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[p53 status and efficacy of primary anthracyclines/alkylating agent-based regimen according to breast cancer molecular classes]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>7</prism:number>
<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1265</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1261</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>breast cancer</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/7/1266?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Renal safety profiles of ibandronate 6 mg infused over 15 and 60 min: a randomized, open-label study]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/7/1266?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background:</b> Clinical data show that a single, 15-min i.v. infusion of ibandronate 6 mg does not significantly alter renal function. We evaluated the effect on renal function of repeated 15-min infusions of ibandronate 6 mg in women with breast cancer and bone metastases.</p>
<p><b>Patients and methods:</b> Patients were randomly assigned to i.v. ibandronate 6 mg every 3&ndash;4 weeks for &le;6 months, infusion over 15 min (<I>n</I> = 102) or 60 min (<I>n</I> = 28). The primary end point was the percentage of patients with increased serum creatinine of &ge;44.2 &micro;mol/l. Blood chemistry was assessed at each visit.</p>
<p><b>Results:</b> Two per cent [2/101; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.2&ndash;7.0] of patients in the 15-min infusion arm and no patients (0/26; 95% CI 0.0&ndash;13.2) in the 60-min infusion arm had increased serum creatinine that met the primary end point. There were no clinically relevant changes in serum creatinine, creatinine clearance, or <I>N</I>-acetyl-&beta;-d-glucosaminidase, <SUB>1</SUB>-microglobulin, or microalbuminuria. Most adverse events were mild or moderate. No clinically relevant changes were observed in vital signs, hematology, blood chemistry, or urine analysis.</p>
<p><b>Conclusions:</b> Ibandronate 6 mg by 15-min infusion every 3&ndash;4 weeks appear to be consistent with those renal safety profiles of 60-min infusion.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[von Moos, R., Caspar, C. B., Thurlimann, B., Angst, R., Inauen, R., Greil, R., Bergstrom, B., Schmieding, K., Pecherstorfer, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-06-25</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdn038</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Renal safety profiles of ibandronate 6 mg infused over 15 and 60 min: a randomized, open-label study]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>7</prism:number>
<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1270</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1266</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>breast cancer</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/7/1271?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Human tissue kallikrein 7, a novel biomarker for advanced ovarian carcinoma using a novel in situ quantitative method of protein expression]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/7/1271?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background:</b> Kallikreins, a subgroup of the serine protease enzyme family, are considered important prognostic biomarkers in cancer. Here, we sought to determine the prognostic value of kallikrein 7 (hk7) in ovarian cancer using a novel method of compartmentalized <I>in situ</I> protein analysis.</p>
<p><b>Patients and methods:</b> A tissue array composed of 150 advanced-stage ovarian cancers, uniformly treated with surgical debulking followed by platinum&ndash;paclitaxel (Taxol) combination chemotherapy, was constructed. For evaluation of kallikrein 7 protein expression, we used an immunofluorescence-based method of automated <I>in situ</I> quantitative measurement of protein analysis (AQUA).</p>
<p><b>Results:</b> Mean follow-up time of the cohort was 34.35 months. One hundred and twenty eight of 150 cases had sufficient tissue for AQUA. In univariate survival analysis, low tumor hk7 expression was associated with better outcome for overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival in 3 years (<I>P</I> values 0.032 and 0.037, respectively). In multivariate survival analysis, adjusting for well-characterized prognostic variables, low tumor hk7 expression level was the most significant predictor variable for OS (95% confidence interval 0.125&ndash;0.729, <I>P</I> = 0.007).</p>
<p><b>Conclusions:</b> High tumor hk7 protein expression is associated with inferior patient outcome in ovarian cancer. hk7 may represent a promising prognostic factor in ovarian cancer.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Psyrri, A., Kountourakis, P., Scorilas, A., Markakis, S., Camp, R., Kowalski, D., Diamandis, E. P., Dimopoulos, M. A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-06-25</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdn035</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Human tissue kallikrein 7, a novel biomarker for advanced ovarian carcinoma using a novel in situ quantitative method of protein expression]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>7</prism:number>
<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1277</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1271</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>gynecologic tumors</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/7/1278?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The role of DNA ploidy in postoperative management of stage I endometrial cancer]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/7/1278?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background:</b> Definition of high-risk stage I endometrial cancer (EC) patients who might benefit from adjuvant therapy (AT) is controversial. Decision is on the basis of traditional prognostic factors. We report our experience in which ploidy has found to play a role in clinical practice since 1999.</p>
<p><b>Patients and methods:</b> Two hundred and twenty-two patients with stage I EC with a median follow-up of 4.57 years were studied. After primary surgery, patients are chronologically divided in group A, from 1990 to 1998 (<I>n</I> = 141), receiving AT in IC stage and group B, from 1999 to 2003 (<I>n</I> = 81), receiving AT in case of DNA index &gt;1.2 or stage IC grade 3 with unknown lymph node status. We analyzed prognostic factors, survival and relapse rate of the two groups.</p>
<p><b>Results:</b> Since ploidy was introduced as a decision-making factor, only 30.6% (<I>n</I> = 11) of patients with stage IC received AT. Despite this considerable decrease of AT, no tumor-related deaths were reported in the group of patients with diploid IC stage who did not receive AT. Only DNA ploidy and age at diagnosis were independent predictors of overall survival.</p>
<p><b>Conclusions:</b> Our results indicate the important role of ploidy in order to identify high-risk patients who need AT and avoid overtreatment.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mangili, G., Montoli, S., De Marzi, P., Sassi, I., Aletti, G., Aletti, G., Taccagni, G.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-06-25</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdn041</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The role of DNA ploidy in postoperative management of stage I endometrial cancer]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>7</prism:number>
<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1283</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1278</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>gynecologic tumors</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/7/1284?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Is there any association between retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy and survival benefit in ovarian clear cell carcinoma patients?]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/7/1284?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background:</b> To estimate the survival impact of systemic retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy in patients diagnosed with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics pTI&ndash;IIb clear cell carcinoma of the ovary (CCC).</p>
<p><b>Patients and Methods:</b> Demographic and clinicopathologic data were obtained from the Tokai Ovarian Tumor Study Group between 1986 and 2006. Survival curves were calculated using the Kaplan&ndash;Meier method. Differences in survival rates were analyzed using the log-rank test.</p>
<p><b>Results:</b> A total of 205 patients had clinical pTI&ndash;IIb CCC (median age: 52 years, range: 30&ndash;75). One hundred and four (50.7%) patients underwent systemic retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy. Lymphadenectomy was not associated with improved disease-free and overall survival in all patients (<I>P</I> = 0.353 and <I>P</I> = 0.645, respectively). Moreover, lymphadenectomy did not improve the overall survival in those with pTIc CCC (<I>P</I> = 0.433). Similarly, on univariate analysis, age, volume of ascites, preoperative CA 125 values, and regimen of chemotherapy were not significant factors. In addition, there was no significant difference in the ratio of positive lymph node metastases regardless of the completion of lymphadenectomy (<I>P</I> = 0.955).</p>
<p><b>Conclusion:</b> Our data suggest that patients with pTI&ndash;IIb CCC who underwent lymphadenectomy did not show a significant improvement in survival. There was no significant difference in the overall and disease-free survival rates in pTI&ndash;IIb CCC patients regardless of the completion of surgical staging lymphadenectomy.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Suzuki, S., Kajiyama, H., Shibata, K., Ino, K., Nawa, A., Sakakibara, K., Matsuzawa, K., Takeda, A., Kinoshita, Y., Kawai, M., Nagasaka, T., Kikkawa, F.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-06-25</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdn059</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Is there any association between retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy and survival benefit in ovarian clear cell carcinoma patients?]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>7</prism:number>
<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1287</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1284</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>gynecologic tumors</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/7/1288?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Adding cetuximab to capecitabine plus oxaliplatin (XELOX) in first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer: a randomized phase II trial of the Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research SAKK]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/7/1288?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background:</b> To determine the activity and tolerability of adding cetuximab to the oxaliplatin and capecitabine (XELOX) combination in first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (MCC).</p>
<p><b>Patients and methods:</b> In a multicenter two-arm phase II trial, patients were randomized to receive oxaliplatin 130 mg/m<sup>2</sup> on day 1 and capecitabine 1000 mg/m<sup>2</sup> twice daily on days 1&ndash;14 every 3 weeks alone or in combination with standard dose cetuximab. Treatment was limited to a maximum of six cycles.</p>
<p><b>Results:</b> Seventy-four patients with good performance status entered the trial. Objective partial response rates after external review and radiological confirmation were 14% and 41% in the XELOX and in the XELOX + Cetuximab arm, respectively. Stable disease has been observed in 62% and 35% of the patients, with 76% disease control in both arms. Cetuximab led to skin rash in 65% of the patients. The median overall survival was 16.5 months for arm A and 20.5 months for arm B. The median time to progression was 5.8 months for arm A and 7.2 months for arm B.</p>
<p><b>Conclusion:</b> Differences in response rates between the treatment arms indicate that cetuximab may improve outcome with XELOX. The correct place of the cetuximab, oxaliplatin and fluoropyrimidine combinations in first-line treatment of MCC has to be assessed in phase III trials.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Borner, M., Koeberle, D., Von Moos, R., Saletti, P., Rauch, D., Hess, V., Trojan, A., Helbling, D., Pestalozzi, B., Caspar, C., Ruhstaller, T., Roth, A., Kappeler, A., Dietrich, D., Lanz, D., Mingrone, W., for the Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research (SAKK), Bern, Switzerland]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-06-25</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdn058</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Adding cetuximab to capecitabine plus oxaliplatin (XELOX) in first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer: a randomized phase II trial of the Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research SAKK]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>7</prism:number>
<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1292</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1288</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>gastrointestinal tumors</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/7/1293?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Insulin-like growth factor (IGF) 1 and 2 help to predict disease outcome in GIST patients]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/7/1293?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background:</b> The expression of the insulin-like growth factor (IGF) system has never been studied in gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs).</p>
<p><b>Patients and methods:</b> We studied the immunohistochemical expression of IGF1 receptor (IGFR-I), IGF1 and IGF2 in 94 samples of GISTs. IGF1 and IGF2 expression was scored in three classes: negative (N), moderate (M) and strong (S), according to staining intensity and extent.</p>
<p><b>Results:</b> IGFR-I was overexpressed in all cases. IGF1 and IGF2 expression was absent in 25 and 48 cases, moderate in 29 and 16 cases and strong in 40 and 30 cases, respectively. Strong IGF1 expression significantly correlated with higher mitotic index (<I>P</I> = 0.0001), larger (<I>P</I> = 0.01), higher risk (<I>P</I> = 0.0002), metastatic (<I>P</I> = 0.0001) and relapsed (<I>P</I> = 0.04) GISTs. Strong IGF2 expression correlated with higher mitotic index (<I>P</I> = 0.05) and higher risk GISTs (<I>P</I> = 0.001). The Kaplan&ndash;Meier analysis (N versus M versus S) showed a significant worsening of the disease-free survival (DFS) with the increase of IGF1 (<I>P</I> = 0.02) and IGF2 (<I>P</I> = 0.02) expression. In the subgroup of patients with operated high-risk GISTs, there was a better trend in DFS for patients affected by GISTs with negative IGF1 and IGF2.</p>
<p><b>Conclusions:</b> The expression of IGF1 and IGF2 seems to predict relapse in GIST patients.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Braconi, C., Bracci, R., Bearzi, I., Bianchi, F., Sabato, S., Mandolesi, A., Belvederesi, L., Cascinu, S., Valeri, N., Cellerino, R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-06-25</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdn040</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Insulin-like growth factor (IGF) 1 and 2 help to predict disease outcome in GIST patients]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>7</prism:number>
<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1298</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1293</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>gastrointestinal tumors</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/7/1299?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Analysis of Pro12Ala PPAR gamma polymorphism and Helicobacter pylori infection in gastric adenocarcinoma and peptic ulcer disease]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/7/1299?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background:</b> Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPAR) is a ligand-dependent transcription factor involved in various disease processes including inflammation and carcinogenesis. We investigated the association of Pro12Ala <I>PPAR</I> polymorphism and <I>Helicobacter pylori</I> infection with gastric cancer and peptic ulcer disease (PUD).</p>
<p><b>Patients and methods:</b> In total, 348 adult patients [62 gastric adenocarcinoma, 45 PUD and 241 nonulcer dyspepsia (NUD)] who underwent an upper gastrointestinal endoscopy were enrolled. <I>PPAR</I> polymorphism was analyzed by PCR-based restriction fragment length polymorphism. <I>H. pylori</I> infection was diagnosed by rapid urease test, culture, histopathology and PCR.</p>
<p><b>Results:</b> <I>PPAR</I> G carrier had significant association with gastric adenocarcinoma [<I>P</I> = 0.023, odds ratio (OR) = 2.136, 95% CI = 1.112&ndash;4.104] and PUD (<I>P</I> = 0.028, OR = 2.165, 95% CI = 1.008&ndash;4.306) when compared with NUD. Combination of G carrier and <I>H. pylori</I> infection further increased the risk of gastric adenocarcinoma (OR = 3.054, 95% CI = 1.195&ndash;7.807) and PUD (OR = 11.161, 95% CI = 3.495&ndash;35.644). <I>PPAR</I> polymorphism did not increase the risk of gastric adenocarcinoma and PUD in <I>H. pylori</I>-negative subjects.</p>
<p><b>Conclusions:</b> The study suggests that Pro12Ala <I>PPAR</I> polymorphism is associated with gastric adenocarcinoma and PUD, and is a potential marker for genetic susceptibility to these two diseases in the presence of <I>H. pylori</I> infection.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Prasad, K. N., Saxena, A., Ghoshal, U. C., Bhagat, M. R., Krishnani, N.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-06-25</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdn055</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Analysis of Pro12Ala PPAR gamma polymorphism and Helicobacter pylori infection in gastric adenocarcinoma and peptic ulcer disease]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>7</prism:number>
<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1303</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1299</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>gastrointestinal tumors</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/7/1304?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[A phase II multicentre study of irinotecan (CPT 11) in combination with cisplatin (CDDP) in metastatic or locally advanced penile carcinoma (EORTC PROTOCOL 30992)]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/7/1304?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background:</b> The aim of this study is to determine efficacy and feasibility of the combination regimen irinotecan and cisplatin in patients with cisplatin advanced penile cancer.</p>
<p><b>Patients and methods:</b> Patients with T3, T4, N1, N2, N3 or M1 cisplatin advanced penile cancer were treated with a combination of irinotecan (60 mg/m<sup>2</sup>) on days 1, 8 and 15 and cisplatin (80mg/m<sup>2</sup>) administered every 28 days. Patients were treated either in the neo-adjuvant setting for T3 or N1&ndash;N2 disease with a maximum of four cycles before surgery or up to eight cycles for T4 or N3 or M1 disease. The study was designed with the aim to exclude a response rate (complete response + partial response) &lt;30% ( = 10%, power = 95%).</p>
<p><b>Results:</b> Twenty-eight patients were included and evaluated for toxicity, and 26 eligible patients were evaluated for response. Toxicity was acceptable with three cases of grade 3 diarrhoea and two cases of grade 4 neutropenic fever. There were eight responses (two complete response and six partial response) (30.8%, 80% confidence interval 18.8% to 45.1%): three patients undergoing histological verification after chemotherapy had no evidence of malignancy.</p>
<p><b>Conclusion:</b> The study fails to demonstrate a response rate significantly &gt;30%.The observation regarding M0 patients suggests to repeat this study in the neo-adjuvant setting.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Theodore, C., Skoneczna, I., Bodrogi, I., Leahy, M., Kerst, J. M., Collette, L., Ven, K., Marreaud, S., Oliver, R. D. T., for the EORTC Genito-Urinary Tract Cancer Group]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-06-25</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdn149</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[A phase II multicentre study of irinotecan (CPT 11) in combination with cisplatin (CDDP) in metastatic or locally advanced penile carcinoma (EORTC PROTOCOL 30992)]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>7</prism:number>
<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1307</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1304</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>urogenital tumors</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/7/1308?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The postchemotherapy PSA surge syndrome]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/7/1308?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background:</b> Chemotherapy has emerged as a standard treatment in patients with castration-refractory prostate cancer (CRPC). Consensus criteria are available to define response in CRPC as at least a 50% decline in serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) confirmed 4 weeks later. The objective of this work was to study early serum PSA changes in patients under chemotherapy and to correlate these changes with subsequent response assessment.</p>
<p><b>Patients and methods:</b> Serum PSA levels were monitored every 3 weeks in 79 patients with CRPC treated with chemotherapy and a time course of serum PSA levels was obtained. Correlation with response was studied.</p>
<p><b>Results:</b> According to consensus criteria, 21 (40%) and 20 (38%) patients achieved a PSA response and stabilization, respectively, after first-line chemotherapy. Among patients who achieved either a response or a stabilization, 8 of 41 (20%) had a serum PSA rise during the first 8 weeks of chemotherapy, followed by a subsequent decline in serum PSA. The same observation was made in patients receiving second-line chemotherapy: 6 of 20 patients achieving a response or stabilization had an initial serum PSA rise. The postchemotherapy increase in serum PSA could reach more than twice the baseline value. The duration of the PSA surge ranged from 1 to 8 weeks. When considering responders only, 6 of 30 (20%) had a postchemotherapy serum PSA surge, followed by a drop.</p>
<p><b>Conclusion:</b> Postchemotherapy PSA surges occur not infrequently in patients with CRPC who respond to chemotherapy. Physicians should be aware of this effect to avoid inadequate early discontinuation of chemotherapy.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Thuret, R., Massard, C., Gross-Goupil, M., Escudier, B., Di Palma, M., Bossi, A., de Crevoisier, R., Chauchereau, A., Fizazi, K.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-06-25</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdn062</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The postchemotherapy PSA surge syndrome]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>7</prism:number>
<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1311</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1308</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>urogenital tumors</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/7/1312?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Long-term outcome of autologous stem-cell transplantation in relapsed or refractory Hodgkin's lymphoma]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/7/1312?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background</b>: The purpose of this study was to assess prognostic factors and outcome of patients with relapsed/refractory Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL) who received high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem-cell transplant (ASCT).</p>
<p><b>Patients and methods</b>: Data on 195 patients who received ASCT between 1985 and June 2005 were reviewed. Median time from first treatment to ASCT was 2.6 years (0.4&ndash;27.3). Demography at ASCT was 61% stage IV, median age 31 years (18&ndash;69), median prior treatment (tx) regimens 3 (2&ndash;7), median Hasenclever index 3 (0&ndash;6); 150 patients had responding disease [54 complete remission (CR), 96 partial remission (PR)], and 45 patients had untested relapse/refractory disease.</p>
<p><b>Results</b>: Post-ASCT, 61% (119/195) patients attained CR with an overall response (CR + PR) of 85%. Twelve patients had nonrelapse mortality. Of 119 patients attaining CR, 27 relapsed: 3 after attaining CR for &gt;5 years and 1 after attaining CR for &gt;10 years. Median overall survival (OS)/progression-free survival (PFS) from ASCT was 9 years/2.9 years. Five-year OS/PFS was 55% of 44% and 10-year OS/PFS was 49.4% of 37% for whole group. Twenty (10%) patients developed second cancer (seven secondary acute myeloid leukaemia (AML)/myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS)). Probability of developing second cancer at 10 years was 14.7% (95% confidence interval 8.9% to 23.8%) and 24.8% at 19 years.</p>
<p><b>Conclusion</b>: These data provide the longest follow-up reported for patients receiving ASCT for relapsed/refractory HL. In addition to previously described prognostic factors, our data show that Hasenclever index &lt;3 influences outcome favorably and attaining CR at ASCT leads to a better outcome.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sirohi, B., Cunningham, D., Powles, R., Murphy, F., Arkenau, T., Norman, A., Oates, J., Wotherspoon, A., Horwich, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-06-25</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdn052</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Long-term outcome of autologous stem-cell transplantation in relapsed or refractory Hodgkin's lymphoma]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>7</prism:number>
<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1319</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1312</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>hematologic malignancies</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/7/1320?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Report of an international expanded access program of imatinib in adults with Philadelphia chromosome positive leukemias]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/7/1320?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background:</b> Imatinib is a selective inhibitor of the BCR/ABL tyrosine kinase. The remarkable initial results of the first phase I clinical trial published in 1999 prompted the rapid initiation of large phase II trials. They also generated intense media coverage and significant interest from patients and clinicians and demand for access to imatinib before marketing approval. In response, a worldwide expanded access program (EAP) for imatinib was implemented in May 2000.</p>
<p><b>Patients:</b> In total, 7380 patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) and acute lymphoblastic leukemia failing prior therapies were enrolled in 106 centers in 34 countries.</p>
<p><b>Results:</b> Time to progression and overall survival, as well as the safety profile, were similar to those observed in published phase II studies. At the end of the program, patients benefiting from treatment were continued on imatinib therapy by transferring to national health care systems or patient assistance programs.</p>
<p><b>Conclusion:</b> The imatinib EAP successfully provided therapy to patients with CML before marketing approval. The program provides an efficient framework for the development of global EAPs for innovative investigational anticancer agents in patients without a satisfactory therapeutic alternative.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Capdeville, R., Krahnke, T., Hatfield, A., Ford, J. M., Van Hoomissen, I., Gathmann, I.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-06-25</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdn050</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Report of an international expanded access program of imatinib in adults with Philadelphia chromosome positive leukemias]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>7</prism:number>
<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1326</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1320</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>hematologic malignancies</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/7/1327?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Intensive treatment strategies may not provide superior outcomes in mantle cell lymphoma: overall survival exceeding 7 years with standard therapies]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/7/1327?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background:</b> Reported median overall survival (OS) in patients with mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) has been reported to be just 3&ndash;4 years. As a consequence, first-line treatment has become more aggressive. Single-center studies with R-Hyper-CVAD and/or autologous stem-cell transplant (ASCT) have produced 3-year OS rates &gt;80%, prompting many to adopt their use. We evaluated outcomes from a single-center cohort managed in a more traditional fashion.</p>
<p><b>Methods:</b> We identified patients with MCL evaluated at Weill Cornell Medical Center since 1997, and included those with known date of diagnosis. An online social security database was used to verify survival.</p>
<p><b>Results:</b> We identified 181 patients with MCL, and date of diagnosis could be determined in 111. Three-year OS from diagnosis was 86% [95% confidence interval (CI) 78% to 92%]. Median OS was 7.1 years (95% CI 63&ndash;98 months). Adequate information on therapy was available for 75 patients. Only five were treated upfront with (R)-Hyper-CVAD or ASCT while an additional four patients received one of these regimens subsequently. Treatment type had no significant effect on OS.</p>
<p><b>Conclusion:</b> Outcomes with standard approaches can yield similar survival to that achieved with more intensive approaches. Biases may account for the perceived superiority of aggressive strategies.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Martin, P., Chadburn, A., Christos, P., Furman, R., Ruan, J., Joyce, M. A., Fusco, E., Glynn, P., Elstrom, R., Niesvizky, R., Feldman, E. J., Shore, T. B., Schuster, M. W., Ely, S., Knowles, D. M., Chen-Kiang, S., Coleman, M., Leonard, J. P.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-06-25</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdn045</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Intensive treatment strategies may not provide superior outcomes in mantle cell lymphoma: overall survival exceeding 7 years with standard therapies]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>7</prism:number>
<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1330</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1327</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>hematologic malignancies</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/7/1331?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Immunochemotherapy with in vivo purging and autotransplant induces long clinical and molecular remission in advanced relapsed and refractory follicular lymphoma]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/7/1331?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background:</b> To evaluate the clinical outcome of patients with relapsed or refractory follicular lymphoma treated with immunochemotherapy, <I>in vivo</I> purging and high-dose therapy with autotransplant.</p>
<p><b>Patients and methods:</b> Sixty-four patients were enrolled in the trial. Primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary end points were the <I>in vivo</I> purging effect on stem-cell harvest and the impact of molecular response on the outcome.</p>
<p><b>Results:</b> At enrollment, 59% of patients were PCR+ for bcl-2 rearrangement in bone marrow (PCR-informative). After the immunochemotherapy, before mobilization, 97% obtained complete response or partial response and 87% of patients informative for bcl-2 were molecularly negative. Sixty-one patients proceeded to <I>in vivo</I> purging and peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) mobilization with rituximab and high-dose AraC. The median number of CD34+ cells collected was 16.6 <FONT FACE="arial,helvetica">x</FONT> 10<sup>6</sup>/kg. Of 33 PCR-informative patients, the harvests resulted in PCR&ndash; in all. Fifty-eight patients received high-dose therapy and autotransplant of <I>in vivo</I> purged PBSC. After a median follow-up of 3.5 years, 41 patients are in complete remission. Five-year PFS is 59%.</p>
<p><b>Conclusion:</b> This study demonstrates that patients with advanced relapsed or refractory follicular lymphoma treated with immunochemotherapy, <I>in vivo</I> purging and autotransplant may obtain long-lasting PFS. In bcl-2-positive patients, <I>in vivo</I> purging allows the harvest of lymphoma-free PBSC. Absence of the bcl-2 rearrangement after autotransplant is associated with persistent clinical remission.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Arcaini, L., Montanari, F., Alessandrino, E. P., Tucci, A., Brusamolino, E., Gargantini, L., Cairoli, R., Bernasconi, P., Passamonti, F., Bonfichi, M., Zoli, V., Bottelli, C., Calatroni, S., Troletti, D., Merli, M., Pascutto, C., Majolino, I., Rossi, G., Morra, E., Lazzarino, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-06-25</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdn044</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Immunochemotherapy with in vivo purging and autotransplant induces long clinical and molecular remission in advanced relapsed and refractory follicular lymphoma]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>7</prism:number>
<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1335</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1331</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>hematologic malignancies</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/7/1336?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Chronic autoimmune thyroiditis (Hashimoto's thyroiditis) in patients with MALT lymphoma]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/7/1336?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background:</b> Autoimmune diseases have been implicated in the genesis of MALT lymphoma of various localizations. The development of thyroidal MALT lymphoma has been described as an adverse event in patients suffering from long-standing chronic autoimmune thyroiditis (CAT, Hashimoto's thyroiditis). The percentage and possible association between CAT and extrathyroidal MALT lymphoma, however, have not been assessed so far.</p>
<p><b>Patients and methods:</b> A retrospective analysis of 80 patients with MALT lymphoma diagnosed and treated at our institution identified a total of 13 patients (16%) with MALT lymphoma suffering from an underlying CAT. Patient characteristics including site of disease, stage, genetic changes and clinical course were assessed and evaluated.</p>
<p><b>Results:</b> In total, 10 patients were female and 3 male, with the median age being 57 years (range: 31&ndash;80). Four patients suffered from thyroidal lymphoma and nine patients had extrathyroidal lymphoma (four gastric, two orbital, one small intestinal and two salivary gland lymphomas). Three patients had a long-standing history of CAT at diagnosis of MALT lymphoma, while CAT was discovered during staging and clinical work-up of MALT lymphoma in the remaining 10 patients. All 13 patients had localized disease, i.e. stage I or II. Only one of the four patients with gastric MALT lymphoma responded to antibiotic treatment against Helicobacter pylori infection. Genetic aberrations were detected in four patients, two of whom had a t(11;18)(q21;q21) translocation, one patient had trisomies 3 and 18 and one had trisomy 18.</p>
<p><b>Conclusion:</b> Our findings suggest that CAT is found in patients with not only thyroidal but also nonthyroidal MALT lymphoma. While the nature of our data does not allow for delineation of a direct association between CAT and development of extrathyroidal MALT lymphoma, further prospective studies on this issue are warranted.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Troch, M., Woehrer, S., Streubel, B., Weissel, M., Hoffmann, M., Mullauer, L., Chott, A., Raderer, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-06-25</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdn049</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Chronic autoimmune thyroiditis (Hashimoto's thyroiditis) in patients with MALT lymphoma]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>7</prism:number>
<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1339</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1336</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>hematologic malignancies</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/7/1340?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[A clinical study assessing the tolerability and biological effects of infliximab, a TNF-{alpha} inhibitor, in patients with advanced cancer]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/7/1340?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background:</b> Tumour necrosis factor- (TNF-) is an important regulator of the chronic inflammation contributing to tumour progression. Infliximab, an anti-TNF- monoclonal antibody was investigated in this trial of patients with advanced cancer. The primary objectives were to determine the safety profile and biological response of infliximab in a cancer population. Clinical response was a secondary objective.</p>
<p><b>Patients and methods:</b> Forty-one patients received infliximab at 5 mg/kg (<I>n</I> = 21) or 10 mg/kg (<I>n</I> = 20) i.v. at 0 and 2 weeks and then every 4 weeks. Post-treatment samples were measured for changes in plasma and serum TNF-, CCL2, IL-6 and C-reactive protein (CRP).</p>
<p><b>Results:</b> Infliximab was well tolerated with no dose-limiting toxic effects. At both doses of infliximab, neutralisation of serum TNF- was observed after 1 h while plasma CCL2, IL-6 and serum CRP were decreased 24 and 48 h following infliximab administration. Seven patients experienced disease stablisation (range 10&ndash;50+ weeks). There was no evidence of disease acceleration in any patient.</p>
<p><b>Conclusions:</b> Infliximab treatment was safe and well tolerated in patients with advanced cancer. There was evidence of biological activity with baseline TNF- and CCL2 being correlated with infliximab response.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brown, E. R., Charles, K. A., Hoare, S. A., Rye, R. L., Jodrell, D. I., Aird, R. E., Vora, R., Prabhakar, U., Nakada, M., Corringham, R. E., DeWitte, M., Sturgeon, C., Propper, D., Balkwill, F. R., Smyth, J. F.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-06-25</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdn054</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[A clinical study assessing the tolerability and biological effects of infliximab, a TNF-{alpha} inhibitor, in patients with advanced cancer]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>7</prism:number>
<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1346</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1340</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>miscellaneous tumors</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/7/1347?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Stopping a trial early in oncology: for patients or for industry?]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/7/1347?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background:</b> The aim of this study is to assess the use of interim analyses in randomised controlled trials (RCTs) testing new anticancer drugs, focussing on oncological clinical trials stopped early for benefit.</p>
<p><b>Materials and methods:</b> All published clinical trials stopped early for benefit and published in the last 11 years, regarding anticancer drugs and containing an interim analysis, were assessed.</p>
<p><b>Results:</b> Twenty-five RCTs were analysed. The evaluation of efficacy was protocol planned through time-related primary end points, &gt;40% of them overall survival. In 95% of studies, at the interim analysis, efficacy was evaluated using the same end point as planned for the final analysis. As a consequence of early stopping after the interim analysis, ~3300 patients/events across all studies were spared. More than 78% of the RCTs published in the last 3 years were used for registration purposes.</p>
<p><b>Conclusion:</b> Though criticism of the poor quality of oncological trials seems out of place, unfortunately early termination raises new concerns. The relation between sparing patients and saving time and trial costs indicates that there is a market-driven intent. We believe that only untruncated trials can provide a full level of evidence which can be translated into clinical practice without further confirmative trials.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Trotta, F., Apolone, G., Garattini, S., Tafuri, G.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-06-25</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdn042</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Stopping a trial early in oncology: for patients or for industry?]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>7</prism:number>
<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1353</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1347</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>clinical trials</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/7/1355?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Circulating interleukin-6 as a tumor marker for hepatocellular carcinoma]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/7/1355?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mantovani, G.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-06-25</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdn290</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Circulating interleukin-6 as a tumor marker for hepatocellular carcinoma]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>7</prism:number>
<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1355</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1355</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>letters to the editor</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/7/1356?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Insulin receptor substrate protein 53 (IRSp53) as a binding partner of antimetastasis molecule NESH, a member of Abelson interactor protein family]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/7/1356?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Matsuda, S., Yokozaki, S., Yoshida, H., Kitagishi, Y., Shirafuji, N., Okumura, N.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-06-25</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdn293</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Insulin receptor substrate protein 53 (IRSp53) as a binding partner of antimetastasis molecule NESH, a member of Abelson interactor protein family]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>7</prism:number>
<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1357</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1356</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>letters to the editor</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/7/1357?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Disambiguating the bisphosphonates]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/7/1357?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Van den Wyngaert, T., Huizing, M. T., Vermorken, J. B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-06-25</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdn356</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Disambiguating the bisphosphonates]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>7</prism:number>
<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1359</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1357</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>letters to the editor</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/7/1359?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Comment on: 'Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma in very elderly patients over 80 years. A descriptive analysis of clinical presentation and outcome']]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/7/1359?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Errante, D., Bianco, A., Aversa, S. M. L., Salvagno, L., On behalf of the Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma Cooperative Study Group (NHLCSG)]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-06-25</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdn355</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Comment on: 'Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma in very elderly patients over 80 years. A descriptive analysis of clinical presentation and outcome']]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>7</prism:number>
<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1360</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1359</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>letters to the editor</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/7/1360?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Breast lymphoma]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/7/1360?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Aviles, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-06-25</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdn379</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Breast lymphoma]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>7</prism:number>
<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1360</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1360</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>letters to the editor</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/7/1360-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Coincidential successful treatment of Jessner-Kanof disease with chemotherapy]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/7/1360-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ardavanis, A., Orphanos, G., Skafida, S., Basioukas, S., Rigatos, G.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-06-25</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdn387</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Coincidential successful treatment of Jessner-Kanof disease with chemotherapy]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>7</prism:number>
<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1361</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1360</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>letters to the editor</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/7/1361?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Response of malignant thymoma to erlotinib]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/7/1361?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Christodoulou, C., Murray, S., Dahabreh, J., Petraki, K., Nikolakopoulou, A., Mavri, A., Skarlos, D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-06-25</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdn388</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Response of malignant thymoma to erlotinib]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>7</prism:number>
<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1362</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1361</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>letters to the editor</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/7/1363?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Volume 18, Supplement 3, A global comparison regarding patient access to cancer drugs]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/7/1363?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-06-25</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdn382</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Volume 18, Supplement 3, A global comparison regarding patient access to cancer drugs]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>7</prism:number>
<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1363</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1363</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>corrigendum</prism:section>
</item>

</rdf:RDF>